Tuesday, April 24, 2018
Answers to Questions About Our Authority and Organization
By Anna Von Reitz
I have described this situation to the Popes repeatedly since 1998. How is it possible that Cardinal XXXXXXXXX remains unaware?
The
Holy See has been acting as our Global Trustee since the Civil War and
selling us all into bondage almost at birth to profit itself. We have
the proof, and in all the discussions that have gone on with the Holy
See, the facts of the matter have never been in dispute.
Our Supreme Government is located in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, where it has always been since 1776. It never moved.
The members of the United States Congress acting as representatives of the "States of States" (business entities literally belonging to our land jurisdiction States) operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea --- in all three levels created by the nasty "Constitution" process: National, Territorial, and Municipal --- moved to a fancy new capitol, Washington, DC, to better expedite their functions. Our land jurisdiction headquarters and the Continental Congress have remained in Philadelphia.
There have always been two kinds of Congress --- United States Congress (sea) and Continental Congress (land).
The Continental Congress of The United States of America (Unincorporated) delegated nineteen enumerated "powers" to the United States Congress to administer.
All of those powers are in the international jurisdiction of the sea. [Even
the abused "interstate commerce clause" is in the international
jurisdiction of the sea, because in America, every state is also a
nation, therefore the word "interstate" is synonymous with
"international".]
Surely
the same organization---the Holy See-- that dreamed up the nightmare
"constitutional system" and who created all these jurisdictions for air, land, and sea administration of their Global Trust,
is competent to explain them to everyone? And surely, a Cardinal
level Bishop entrusted with running the Church's secular business can
explain all this to you even better than I can. Bring this to Cardinal
XXXXXXXXX.
If you examine the historical records it is crystal clear that the first Union of States is The United States of America, that this entity is "corporate" but not "incorporated", and that it is the Source of all delegated authority entrusted to the members of the United States Congress.
It is also clear that The United States of America retained for itself and its member States all authorities related to our soil and land jurisdiction as well as retaining all non-delegated powers in the international jurisdiction of the sea (see Amendment X where the members of the United States Congress admitted the fact).
In order to delegate power, XXXXXX, someone or something must first possess that power.
The Grantor of all "powers" ever vested in the United States Congress came from the Continental Congress of The United States of America,
and when the United States Congress bungles itself into pernicious
international intrigues and bankruptcies for profit, such that they are
incompetent and insolvent, all those delegated powers return to the Grantor, to us, the sovereign States and People of this country and our Union of States ----- The United States of America.
Not a particle of our soil or land is
under the dominion of the fraud artists in Washington, DC, and now that
they have rendered themselves incompetent, all our delegated powers
naturally return to us for our administration. That's what happened in 2015 with the Municipal Government and what happened again in 2017 with the Territorial Government.
We are the Priority Creditors and Holders in Due Course, owed all intellectual and actual property assets of both the Municipal United States and the Territorial United States.
When our claims are met, the rest of the world can have whatever is left.
We
have been competently operating our affairs to deal with these
bankruptcies and arranging them so as to keep the constitutional system
intact long enough for us to convene a Continental Congress of our member States, which are not--- as you will note ---- States of States.
As
we are the sovereigns of this country it isn't anyone else's business
to question our actions or our scheduling of Congressional Sessions, the
locations of our meetings or anything else that we choose to do. The
important point to you and the entire rest of the world is that yes, we
are still here, we are awake and minding our shop, and we have made that
very, very clear on the public record for a number of years.
The States are now assembling their delegations for a Continental Congress Session.
At that Session we will clean up the mess that this country has been in
for 150 years and we will likely choose to overturn the entire
constitutional system. There is no known reason for us to continue to
allow Great Britain to meddle in our affairs, especially in the face of already adjudicated gross incompetence, breach of trust, and violation of their commercial contract obligations.
If this is in any way Big News to you, or to the Cardinal, please be advised. Any "US Bankruptcy Trustee" operating as an Interpol Agent on
our soil without the benefit of this information is skating on very
thin ice. It would be extremely advisable if you will please advise the
Cardinal and for him to advise the rest of the Cardinals and for them
to competently advise the rest of the world. This is the way it is, and
the way it has always been since 1776.
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Answer to Hiring Attorneys
By Anna Von Reitz
Answer to Hiring Attorneys
Never hire a Bar Attorney. Ever. He is an Officer of the Court and his first duty and loyalty is to profit the Court --- and how is that going to happen except by--- in one way or another--- dis-serving and defrauding you?
This is a big part of the reason that these "Courts" enjoy a 97% conviction rate. People hire attorneys thinking that these men are going to work for them and for their good, but in fact, they are financing their own destruction.
If any Court addresses you, you need to present a certified copy of your recorded Mandatory FSIA Notice and ask them pointedly ---who gave you permission to address me?
If they attempt to enter a plea for you, you must remind the judge that he or she is precluded from practicing law while on the bench. And you do not consent to his or her action.
If they attempt to assign a Public Defender, require him or her to accept complete commercial liability for any harm done to your "vessel and cargo"---- they will slink away.
So, how can you hope to defend yourself against these pirates in robes and fend off their odious presumptions?
Start by looking for and hiring a competent "Counselor-at-Law".
A Counselor doesn't work for the court --- he or she is actually likely to work for you and for your benefit against the court. A good Counselor-at-Law has studied both law and procedure, but is not necessarily someone who went to Law School.
In fact, the product of our American Law Schools is more likely to have problems functioning as a Counselor-at-Law because he or she has learned very little about actual law or justice and a great deal about procedure and little "tricks" to pull, catch phrases to use, and things of that nature---- which don't apply to the functions of a Counselor-at-Law.
Increasingly we are seeing former judges and former Bar Attorneys entering the fray as Counselors-at-Law. They have torn up their Salvage Tickets (Bar Cards) and are now doing what they can to salvage their profession and make correction.
That's good on them, and I encourage their defection, but they often face a year or two of reorientation and intense learning, during which time they may not be as effective as a Counselor-at-Law as someone who never went to a Law School.
We are looking forward to establishing a Mentor's Program for Counselors-at-Law to help transition former Bar Members.
We are also seeing self-styled free-lance Private Attorney Generals (PAG's) who basically perform the functions of a Counselor-at-Law for US Citizens. By all means, if you are not able to quit your federal government job, are an African American, or otherwise obligated to remain in the federal jurisdiction and subject to their courts for the time being--- look for a Private Attorney General.
Rod Class has trained up quite a few Private Attorney Generals and more are in training. These men and women, like Rod, take on the Beast from a different jurisdiction, but like Counselors-at-Law, PAG's work for you--- not the court.
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Follow Up on Marshals Services and Piracy
By Anna Von Reitz
Please be aware that the current "US Marshals Service" is being run by Interpol on a contractual basis and that both Steven T. Mnuchin and Jeff Sessions are Interpol Officers. They take their instructions out of Berne, Switzerland. They are still under obligation to obey our laws and fulfill our contracts, or they are subject to arrest and prosecution.
This
places them in an odd No Man's Land. To become Interpol Officers, they
forswear and give up their citizenship, so that they no longer can be
considered either Americans (gave up or were swindled out of their
birthright and then confirmed it by going to work and staying employed
by the Territorial United States) or as "US Citizens".
Much
of the crime that goes on in the international jurisdictions policed by
the US Marshals and Continental Marshals is in the nature of piracy---
what happens in many of these courts is a form of "inland piracy".
They dry-dock their foreign "vessels" on our land, and open a foreign
court and shanghai unwary Americans into their jurisdiction via improper
solicitations and falsified public records.
Remember these two Maxims of Law pertaining to piracy, which my friend BB reminded me of this morning:
A piratis et latronibus capta dominium non mutant.
Things captured by pirates or robbers do not change their ownership.
A piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent.
Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.
If
you have lost homes, or automobiles, businesses or children, your good
name or your time as a result of actions undertaken by pirates
masquerading as judges, you are owed their return and restitution.
All these things remain yours no matter what these criminals allege, what force they employ, or what excuses they make.
This
entire country has suffered inland piracy and unlawful conversion, but
all that it has ever possessed is still lawfully ours and the pirates
are still what they are.
Since
2013 they have operated without any veil of protection--- no
privateer's licenses, no valid salvage tickets (Bar Cards)--- so we are
totally free and within our internationally acknowledged rights to go
after them and they are without the protection of any state or nation,
lawless, and out-lawed.
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Monday, April 23, 2018
The De Jure Original Jurisdiction Assemblies of We THE People is here and growing!
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This is following the footsteps of our founding fathers.
The national level assembly has zero jurisdiction within any of the organic states. The national assembly is also known as the continental congress and is a collection of representatives from the assemblies of the 50 states in quorum. Each state is a foreign nation to the other states. They are unique from each other. The 50 states assemblies are growing fast and need more people to be involved with their state's assemblies. When adequate numbers of people are reached then the state's assemblies will publish notice of their presence to their de facto corporate state governance and to Donald Trump, the joint chiefs, and the pentagon. After the noticing is completed and the rebuttal time has expired then the states and the national level assemblies will have some teeth to redress grievances.
At this time California has 33 people in assembly where a minimum of 30 is required to give notice. The other states are catching up to that number. Florida, Texas, Hawaii, Alaska, Washington, and Arizona are getting close. A grand jury of 25 plus 2 alternates and a few investigators makes the number of 30 as a requirement.
Thanks to the Michigan General Jural Assembly for blazing the trail over the last 10 years and completing all the steps to becoming a lawful De Jure state recognized globally. The MGJA created a handbook and the 10 steps to teach people on the other states to duplicate what the Michigan General Jural Assembly has done. All the research and hard work has been done to make this proper and lawful. The system is in place and all that is missing is the people.
The De Facto Domestic Terrorism Task Force has already investigated and examined this system and declared it lawful and proper. There is no need to feel afraid to get involved. Nobody will be harassed or go to jail for reassembling our original jurisdiction republic. Donald Trump is waiting for the notices to show up on his desk. The Pentagon and the Joint Chiefs are waiting for the notices too! Lets not let them down. Donald Trump promised to return the power back to the people during his U.N. speech to the world and we are going to take it back. The sooner this is done the sooner the criminals are gone and the meek inherit the earth.
Yes this has become a global endeavor. There are many foreign countries studying what we are doing and contacting the national assembly to get involved in their own countries and apply the principals within their own nations.
To get involved with your state assembly send an email to contentmanager1@yahoo.com with your state in the subject line and/or register in the forums on https://national-assembly.net/ and post an introduction in your state's forum section so your state assembly coordinator can get in contact with you. Ask questions you may have in the proper forums and they will be answered. Your questions may already be answered. So feel free to look around and use the search box at the top in the banner.
Spread this message far and wide so all Americans see it. Share it on your social media sites. Share it with your neighbors and friends. Post it up in your local gathering places and billboards.
Roll Call is every Thursday evening at 9pm Eastern time.
1st hour business, 2nd hour general chat and education.
1-712-770-4160, access code 226823#
Thank You for restoring our country and freedom
We THE People Assembled
My Opinion -- Turn It Off
By Anna Von Reitz
When we stand here and
let a porn star lecture us about morality and the rights of women--- we
are as nuts as she is. And when we fail our duty to "Turn the Knob" and
silence the Mainstream Media promoting this idiocy, we are doubly
damned as stand up idiots.
Turn it off. Just do it. And leave it off.
You
will sleep better. You will spend less money. You will feel happier.
You will not be vexed or worried or confused. Life will snap back into
view.
You
will have more time with your family and pets and gainful hobbies.
Find a good weather channel for the only real news likely to impact
you.
Believe
me, you can do without "news" about fighting in Afghanistan, truck
accidents in Chicago, and "Stormy" Daniels--- and be just fine.
I
haven't listened to a mainstream "news" program since 1987. There is
life after addiction---and it's a great life, full of one's own
intellectual inquiries and adventures, devoid of senseless fears and
useless trivia.
And hopefully also free of the cloying, illogical, mindless moral preening of whores.
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
The Continental Marshals Service
By Anna Von Reitz
Like most everything else
that has been bungled up and misrepresented by the British Territorial
Government run amok, there are supposed to be (2) Marshal's Services.
The
land jurisdiction officers were always called "Federal Marshals"
because they work for the Federation of States --- The United States of
America (Unincorporated). Federal Marshals are officers of the Postal
District Courts.
The
sea jurisdiction officers were always called "US Marshals" because they
work under the auspices of the Territorial United States and under its
delegated authorities. US Marshals are officers of the US District
Courts.
Since
1965 the run amok and misdirected British Territorial Government has
usurped upon their employer, The United States of America, and has
"presumed" to run the Federal Marshals Service under the auspices of the
US Marshals Service.
This
has created a great deal of confusion both inside and outside the
Service and general chaos overall because nobody has had a clear
understanding of the different duties and jurisdictions to be covered by
this supposedly "combined service" and most importantly, there is no
delegated authority delegated to the US Territorial Government to manage
the Federal Marshals or our Postal District Courts.
As
a result, in May 2016, the lawful government of The United States of
America (Unincorporated) issued an Act of State restoring and re-naming
the Federal Marshals Service as "The Continental Marshals Service" in an
effort to make a clear and public distinction between the two
jurisdictions, the two court systems and their related officers.
Since
then there has been continuing confusion about this "new" Marshals
Service. We have had private companies trying to claim that they are
Continental Marshals. We have had tribal governments trying to deputize
Continental Marshals.
Let's
make this perfectly clear: there is exactly one (1) Continental
Marshals Service mandated, patented, and copyrighted by the lawful
government of The United States of America (Unincorporated).
No
private company has the right or ability to adopt or infringe upon the
name of The Continental Marshals Service and no tribal authority has
permission to deputize Continental Marshals. Each Continental Marshal
holds a direct commission from The United States of America
(Unincorporated) and works directly for one of the Postal District
Courts.
As land jurisdiction officers they hold the highest international peacekeeping office in this country.
They
are uniquely responsible for addressing crimes of human trafficking,
gun and drug running, interstate bank fraud, inland piracy, treaty
violations, prevention of interstate scams and crimes across state
borders. They provide security for the Postal Services and investigate
postal crimes.
They
take their non-sectarian Oath of Public Office directly under the
auspices of The United States of America (Unincorporated) and they act
with the full force and authority of the Federation of Sovereign States.
All
US Marshals are functioning under powers delegated to the Territorial
United States which have now been recalled to The United States of
America (Unincorporated) during their Territorial bankruptcy and
"national emergency" ---and re-assigned.
The
Continental Marshals work closely and cooperatively with the US
Marshals to coordinate joint operations across jurisdictional lines to
prevent international crimes; in America, this duty and jurisdiction
includes interstate crimes.
There
are fifty US Marshals, one assigned to every Territorial State of
State, plus deputies, and there are fifty Continental Marshals, one
assigned to every State, plus deputies.
Although
Federal Marshals have been on duty practically from the formation of
our government, The Continental Marshals Service, as such, is only two
years old. A great deal of hard work has been devoted to restoring this
honored force and the Postal District Courts owed to this country, but
much more needs to be done, more training, and more resources devoted.
In
the meantime, please show these men and women the respect they deserve
and help cut down on the amount of confusion by passing this information
along to everyone concerned.
----------------------------
See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
Occupational Licensing Gone Wild April 20, 2018 by IWB
Governments have overreached yet again in requiring a license to perform work that is not in the realm of public safety for consumers.
Sandefur stated how it started and what it has become today, “Okay, yeah - you gotta get licensing to do something that might be really risky to public health and safety and we accept little by little and eventually we have this growing trend where people are not allowed to work or start a business at all without first getting government permission.”
Our insistence on government telling us what to do has hopefully peaked, but recent examples around the country might suggest otherwise.
Over the last 50 years, Sandefur pointed out, 1 in 20 Americans were required to get permission from the government to work by obtaining a license. This included obvious professions in the medical or educational fields. However, today, this number has exploded to 1 in 5 Americans being required to obtain an occupational license, essentially a permission slip from the government, to do their job. Other figures peg the number at closer to 1 in 4.
Is there any reason to believe this grotesque trajectory won’t continue?
Incredibly, over half of all jobs that require licenses are only required in one state. Examples include graphic designers, audio engineers, and travel agents.
Consequences of not obtaining permission from the government to work include massive fines and even jail time.
This government intervention in the economy restricts liberty and confiscates our freedom to make a living.
Many people do not have the money to go to school, so they try to start a business and provide a service, only to run into the pointed gun of government telling them they can’t unless they spend an enormous amount of time and money to get the “proper training.”
Even more disturbing is the fact that when one challenges these licensing laws, they are guilty until proven innocent. Prospective entrepreneurs have to show the government why they should be free to work without permission from the government, but there is no burden of proof for the government to prove why the occupation should be licensed in the first place.
One atrocious example is requiring a license to blow dry hair. To get this permission, one must spend $15,000 in schooling and put in 1,000 hours to be “trained.” This training includes things like perming and drying hair, activities not performed when you are merely blow drying hair.
This outrageous spike in occupational licensing is an obvious example of established businesses colluding with all-powerful government to keep new competition at bay. Those who can afford schooling for the proper licensing work to make it illegal for others to enter the profession, ensuring less competition. In essence, “this license protects their jobs,” Sandefur concluded.
A recent report written by Mark Flatten, an investigative journalist for the Goldwater Institute, titled Occupational Licensing Laws and the Right to Earn a Living, digs into the government’s outlandish actions to regulate an increasing numbers of occupations.
There is no public cry for these professions to be regulated, Flatten writes, “Licensing almost always comes at the behest of the regulated industries themselves rather than in response to consumer demands or some demonstrated need to protect the public.” This added regulation makes it more difficult for newcomers to enter a profession, allowing existing businesses to charge approximately 15 percent more for their services, according to Morris Kleiner, a labor policy professor at the University of Minnesota and a noted expert on the economic consequences of occupational licensing.
Still, the argument that these licensing measures protect the public from harm is continuously made by industry lobbyists clamoring for additional licensure. Only 30 professions are actually licensed in all 50 states, according to Flatten. This clarifies the fact that since most professions are licensed only in one state, this excessive licensing is completely unnecessary on the grounds of public safety.
Examples of licensed occupations required in most or all 50 states include:
- cosmetologists
- massage therapists
- land surveyors
- acupuncturists
- real estate agents
A law in Louisiana mandates florists to have a license!
Other professions that require a license that have little to no effect on public health are:
- interior designers
- locksmiths
- alarm installers
- hypnotists
- motion picture operators
- parking valets
- magicians
- landscapers
- horseshoers
- furniture upholsterers
Occupational licensing has given state regulatory boards broad powers over active market participants, leading to a “risk of self-dealing,” Flatten writes. The U.S. Supreme Court in 2015 put a stop to a North Carolina dental board shutting down teeth-whitening companies that were competing with local and licensed dentists. In turn, occupational licensing “has become a protection racket for politically powerful industries that are able to use the force of government to control monopolies, drive out competition, and punish upstarts in ways that would be illegal in other circumstances.”
Republican Senator Mike Lee from Utah echoed this sentiment, saying, “Occupational licensing has grown not because consumers demanded it, but because lobbyists recognized a business opportunity where they could use government power to get rich at the public’s expense.”
This comes at a high cost to the economy, putting a cap on business creation and employment growth. Kleiner estimates that about 2.8 million jobs are lost each year due to licensing with education, training, testing, and licensing requirements creating a barrier to entry.
Below is a list compiled by Flatten of mundane professions that require a license in the U.S.
- Chimney sweepers are licensed in Vermont.
- Parking valets are licensed in West Virginia.
- People who sell, service, or install portable fire extinguishers are licensed in Arkansas and Tennessee.
- Iowa requires licenses for manure applicators and manure service representatives.
- Minnesota licenses animal waste technicians and is the only state to license horse-teeth floaters.
- Arkansas and New York license farriers, commonly known as horseshoers.
- California has eight separate licenses for furniture upholsters, suppliers, builders, and sellers.
- Massachusetts licenses horseback riding instructors and motion picture operators.
- Appliance installers need a license in South Dakota
- Sign installers need to be licensed in California.
- Illinois licenses wardrobe attendants and restaurant busing staff.
- Grease processors are licensed in Wisconsin.
- Kentucky, Mississippi, Wisconsin, and New Mexico license art therapists.
- Wisconsin licenses dance therapists.
- North Dakota and Nevada license music therapists.
- New Hampshire licenses recreational therapists.
- Taxidermists are licensed in 16 states.
- Hunting and fishing guides and outfitters are licensed in 17 states.
- Auctioneers are licensed in 21 states.
- New Mexico licenses animal artificial insemination technicians.
- New York licenses milk testers.
- Arkansas has separate licenses for people who design, manufacture, install, and clean septic tanks
In short, occupational licensing has gotten out of control and it shows few signs of slowing down due to an army of lobbyists lobbying on behalf of existing businesses.
“Ridiculous licensing rules are holding back people who want to work,” Glenn Harlan Reynolds’ opinion column headline read in USA Today. Another example of needless licensing he references is a proposal to require personal training licenses, an investigation Reason TV revealed to be funded by the soda industry.
“Most occupational licensing is corrupt and idiotic,” Reynolds wrote. We don’t need “300 hours of training to shampoo hair.” That does not protect the consumer. It protects current practitioners in the profession. Government power is used to stifle competition in an expansive manner with each passing year.
Reynolds referenced the liberty-lover Milton Friedman who observed in his book, Capitalism and Freedom, “The pressure on the legislature to license an occupation rarely comes from the members of the public who have been mulcted or in other ways abused by members of the occupation. On the contrary, the pressure invariably comes from members of the occupation itself.”
This is all blatantly obvious to anyone who takes 5 minutes to research this issue. But our governments remain oblivious and many consumers hapless to this unneeded government intervention in our 'free market economy'.
Conor Friedersdorf wrote a piece in The Atlantic last year about this crazy occupational licensing. He agrees with the unnecessary nature resulting in self-dealing mentioned above, writing, “Too often, occupational-licensing laws are less about protecting workers or consumers as a class than they are about protecting the interests of incumbents. Want to compete with me? Good luck, now that I’ve lobbied for a law that requires you to shell out cash and work toward a certificate before you can begin.”
Worthwhile reforms a 2017 Institute for Justice report called for were to make it easier for aspiring employees and business owners to bring legal challenges against these onerous licensing laws.
The IJ report references the backward burden of proof Sandefur also mentioned:
“The U.S. Constitution protects the right to earn an honest living free from unreasonable government interference, yet courts have often been reluctant to enforce this right by striking down arbitrary or irrational licensing laws. Under the prevailing legal standard, licensing laws are presumed valid when challenged in court, and individuals must prove that they are unconstitutional. This gets it exactly backward. Governments should have to prove that licensing laws advance legitimate health and safety concerns to justify restrictions on the right to earn a living.”
The government has no right to restrict our freedom to earn a living for ourselves. Occupational licensing must be rolled back. Companies cannot be allowed to raise the barrier to entry for those simply wanting to provide a valuable service to consumers and provide for themselves and their families. There is no need for most of these occupations to be licensed. We need to make our economy great again by rolling back these unnecessary regulations as the Trump administration has done in DC with its pro-business regulatory rollback agenda.
http://www.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
